كيف يُحسب سكور ساحة؟
The SAHA Score — how it works, and why you can trust it.
A number from 0 to 1000 measuring a creator's real standing across Twitch, YouTube, TikTok, Instagram, and Kick — in one comparable figure. Nothing is hidden: every daily score stores a full record of the inputs and weights that produced it.
Your SAHA Score blends how big you are, how fast you're growing, your recent momentum, how consistently you show up, and your standing among peers — then adjusts for how confident we are in your data and removes the effect of fake spikes.
الركائز الخمس
The five pillars
The raw score is a weighted blend of five measured pillars. The weights are fixed, public, and the same for everyone.
| Pillar | Weight | What it measures |
|---|---|---|
| Presence الحضور | 25% | Your audience size across all platforms |
| Growth النمو | 25% | How fast your following is increasing |
| Momentum الزخم | 20% | Whether you are heating up or cooling down recently |
| Consistency الالتزام | 15% | How regularly you stream or post |
| Rank الترتيب | 15% | Your standing within your country’s creator pool |
1. Presence — 25%
Audience size, but not raw follower count. We use a logarithmic scale — the single most important fairness decision in the system. On a raw scale, a creator with 1,000,000 followers would score 1,000× higher than one with 1,000, making the score nothing but a follower leaderboard. With log scaling, growing from 1K to 10K earns the same presence jump as a huge creator going from 100K to 1M. Presence also includes a small multi-platform bonus (+8% per extra active platform, capped) and a platform coefficient so followers on different platforms are weighed fairly.
2. Growth — 25%
The percentage increase in your following over the last 7 days, weighted by platform. Percentage — not absolute — so a creator adding 500 followers to a base of 5,000 (a strong 10%) is rewarded more than one adding 500 to a base of 500,000 (a flat 0.1%). Small creators with real traction outscore coasting large ones here.
3. Momentum — 20%
Compares your recent activity across three time windows — the last 3, 10, and 30 days — weighing the most recent window most heavily (55% / 30% / 15%). It answers: is this creator accelerating right now, or stalling? This is what surfaces a breakout week before the big numbers catch up. Momentum labels (Cooling Down → Stable → Building Momentum → Rising Fast → Exploding) are assigned relative to peers, not a fixed target.
4. Consistency — 15%
For streamers: days live in the last 30, current streak, and whether you held a regular weekly cadence against your own posted schedule. For non-streaming creators: how regularly you publish. This pillar deliberately rewards showing up over being big — a mid-size creator who streams 5 days a week beats a larger one who streams once a month.
5. Rank — 15%
Your position within your country's creator pool, so the score reflects competitive standing, not just raw stats. (See “Known limitations” — we're aware this pillar needs refinement and are transparent about it.)
عدالة المنصات
Platform fairness — why a TikTok follower ≠ a Twitch follower
TikTok can hand someone 100,000 followers from one viral video; earning 100,000 Twitch followers takes years of live streaming. Ignoring that would let TikTok creators dominate every ranking. So each platform gets normalization coefficients:
| Platform | Growth | Presence | Consistency | Why |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| YouTube | 1.00 | 1.05 | 1.00 | Baseline reference |
| TikTok | 0.82 | 0.88 | 0.90 | Viral volatility softened — not punished |
| 0.92 | 0.95 | 0.90 | Moderate | |
| Twitch | 1.08 | 1.05 | 1.15 | Live consistency rewarded |
| Kick | 1.08 | 1.05 | 1.08 | Level with Twitch |
TikTok is softened, not penalized — volatility is smoothed so a single viral spike doesn't permanently distort the ranking, but sustained TikTok performance still scores fully. The same real effort and real audience should produce a comparable score on any platform.
الحماية من التلاعب
What protects the score from manipulation
Confidence gating
Every creator carries a Confidence Score (0–100) based on how long we’ve watched them, how complete the data is, and how reliably their platforms sync. A creator we’ve only watched for 3 days cannot top the leaderboard — their score is pulled toward neutral until the data matures. The label (Calibrating → Developing → Mature → Verified) is shown on every profile.
Anomaly detection
Sudden suspicious jumps — a 20%+ single-day follower spike, a buy-then-drop pattern, one platform exploding while others stay flat — are flagged at four severity levels. At the highest severity the score is frozen and cannot move upward, neutralizing bought followers.
Spike dampening
The score runs through an exponentially-weighted moving average. A wild one-day swing is capped at a multiple of the creator’s normal variation, so a single day’s numbers can’t jerk the score around.
Stagnation decay
A large creator who stops working and coasts on old follower count takes a gradual penalty (up to 12%) when presence is high but growth, momentum, and consistency are all weak. You cannot park at the top.
كيف نحمي صناع المحتوى الصغار
How small creators are protected
- Log scaling heavily compresses size advantage.
- Percentage-based growth and momentum reward real traction over raw scale — a fast-rising 5K creator beats a flat 500K one on 45% of the score.
- Consistency rewards effort, which any creator controls regardless of size.
- Stagnation decay actively pulls down coasting large creators.
- Momentum labels are peer-relative, so a breakout is recognized immediately.
A small creator who shows up consistently, grows steadily, and has real momentum will out-rank a larger creator who is bigger but stagnant. That is by design.
حدود النظام — بكل شفافية
Known limitations (v1.1.0)
We would rather tell you these than have you find them:
- Engagement is not yet directly measured. The score currently uses follower growth and activity as the engagement signal, not raw likes/comments/shares per post. A dedicated rate-based Engagement pillar is the #1 roadmap item (planned for v1.2) and will become the largest single pillar.
- The Rank pillar is partly self-referential — today's rank is influenced by yesterday's. We're reworking it to reduce incumbent bias.
- Retention and watch-time are not yet in the score — they require creator-authorized platform access. They'll be added as a bonus where available, never as a penalty.
Every score is stamped with its formula version so historical scores stay comparable and any change is traceable.
ماذا تعني التسميات على الملف الشخصي
What each profile label means
| Label | Meaning |
|---|---|
| Calibrating | We’ve watched < 7 days — score is provisional |
| Developing | Data is stabilizing, 14–30 days |
| Mature signal | 30–90 days of reliable data |
| Verified | 90+ days of stable, continuous data — highest trust |
| Rising Fast / Exploding | Momentum in the top 10–30% of peers right now |
| Stable | Performing in line with the field |
الخلاصة للوكالات والعلامات التجارية
The bottom line for agencies
The SAHA Score is not a follower count. It is a defended, multi-signal measure that:
- compares creators fairly across platforms,
- gives small creators a real path to rank on merit,
- is resistant to bought followers and fake spikes through four independent safeguards,
- declares its own confidence so you know how much to trust each number,
- and is fully auditable — every score keeps the receipts.
Formula version v1.1.0. This methodology is public and versioned. For any specific creator's breakdown, see the “Why this score” panel on their profile.